Autonomous Skill Orchestrator v2.0
Inspired by oh-my-opencode's three-layer architecture, adapted for OpenClaw's ecosystem.
Core Philosophy
Traditional AI follows: user asks โ AI responds. This fails for complex work because:
- Context overload: Large tasks exceed context windows
- Cognitive drift: AI loses track mid-task
- Verification gaps: No systematic completeness check
- Human bottleneck: Requires constant intervention
This skill solves these through specialization and delegation.
Architecture
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ PLANNING LAYER (Interview + Plan Generation) โ
โ โข Clarify intent through interview โ
โ โข Generate structured work plan โ
โ โข Review plan for gaps โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ ORCHESTRATION LAYER (Atlas - The Conductor) โ
โ โข Read plan, delegate tasks โ
โ โข Accumulate wisdom across tasks โ
โ โข Verify results independently โ
โ โข NEVER write code directly โ only delegate โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ EXECUTION LAYER (Sub-agents via sessions_spawn) โ
โ โข Focused task execution โ
โ โข Return results + learnings โ
โ โข Isolated context per task โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
Activation
Explicit Triggers
- "use autonomous-skill-orchestrator"
- "activate autonomous-skill-orchestrator"
- "start autonomous orchestration"
- "ulw" or "ultrawork" (magic keyword mode)
Magic Word: ultrawork / ulw
Include ultrawork or ulw in any prompt to activate full orchestration mode automatically.
The agent figures out the rest โ parallel agents, background tasks, deep exploration, and relentless execution until completion.
Phase 1: Planning (Prometheus Mode)
Step 1.1: Interview
Before planning, gather clarity through brief interview:
Ask only what's needed:
- What's the core objective?
- What are the boundaries (what's NOT in scope)?
- Any constraints or preferences?
- How do we know when it's done?
Interview Style by Intent:
| Intent | Focus | Example Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Refactoring | Safety | "What tests verify current behavior?" |
| Build New | Patterns | "Follow existing conventions or deviate?" |
| Debug/Fix | Reproduction | "Steps to reproduce? Error messages?" |
| Research | Scope | "Depth vs breadth? Time constraints?" |
Step 1.2: Plan Generation
After interview, generate structured plan:
## Work Plan: [Title]
### Objective
[One sentence, frozen intent]
### Tasks
- [ ] Task 1: [Description]
- Acceptance: [How to verify completion]
- References: [Files, docs, skills needed]
- Category: [quick|general|deep|creative]
- [ ] Task 2: ...
### Guardrails
- MUST: [Required constraints]
- MUST NOT: [Forbidden actions]
### Verification
[How to verify overall completion]
Step 1.3: Plan Review (Self-Momus)
Before execution, validate:
- Each task has clear acceptance criteria
- References are concrete (not vague)
- No scope creep beyond objective
- Dependencies between tasks are explicit
- Guardrails are actionable
If any check fails, refine plan before proceeding.
Phase 2: Orchestration (Atlas Mode)
Conductor Rules
The orchestrator:
- โ CAN read files to understand context
- โ CAN run commands to verify results
- โ CAN search patterns with grep/glob
- โ CAN spawn sub-agents for work
The orchestrator:
- โ MUST NOT write/edit code directly
- โ MUST NOT trust sub-agent claims blindly
- โ MUST NOT skip verification
Step 2.1: Task Delegation
Use sessions_spawn with category-appropriate configuration:
| Category | Use For | Model Hint | Timeout |
|---|---|---|---|
quick |
Trivial tasks, single file changes | fast model | 2-5 min |
general |
Standard implementation | default | 5-10 min |
deep |
Complex logic, architecture | thinking model | 10-20 min |
creative |
UI/UX, content generation | creative model | 5-10 min |
research |
Docs, codebase exploration | fast + broad | 5 min |
Delegation Template:
sessions_spawn(
label: "task-{n}-{short-desc}",
task: """
## Task
{exact task from plan}
## Expected Outcome
{acceptance criteria}
## Context
{accumulated wisdom from previous tasks}
## Constraints
- MUST: {guardrails}
- MUST NOT: {forbidden actions}
## References
{relevant files, docs}
""",
runTimeoutSeconds: {based on category}
)
Step 2.2: Parallel Execution
Identify independent tasks (no file conflicts, no dependencies) and spawn them simultaneously:
# Tasks 2, 3, 4 have no dependencies
sessions_spawn(label="task-2", task="...")
sessions_spawn(label="task-3", task="...")
sessions_spawn(label="task-4", task="...")
# All run in parallel
Step 2.3: Wisdom Accumulation
After each task completion, extract and record:
## Wisdom Log
### Conventions Discovered
- [Pattern found in codebase]
### Successful Approaches
- [What worked]
### Gotchas
- [Pitfalls to avoid]
### Commands Used
- [Useful commands for similar tasks]
Store in: memory/orchestrator-wisdom.md (append-only during session)
Pass accumulated wisdom to ALL subsequent sub-agents.
Step 2.4: Independent Verification
NEVER trust sub-agent claims. After each task:
- Read actual changed files
- Run tests/linting if applicable
- Verify acceptance criteria independently
- Cross-reference with plan requirements
If verification fails:
- Log the failure in wisdom
- Re-delegate with failure context
- Max 2 retries per task, then escalate to user
Phase 3: Completion
Step 3.1: Final Verification
- All tasks marked complete
- All acceptance criteria verified
- No unresolved issues in wisdom log
Step 3.2: Summary Report
## Orchestration Complete
### Completed Tasks
- [x] Task 1: {summary}
- [x] Task 2: {summary}
### Learnings
{key wisdom accumulated}
### Files Changed
{list of modified files}
### Next Steps (if any)
{recommendations}
Safety Guardrails
Halt Conditions (Immediate Stop)
- User issues explicit stop command
- Irreversible destructive action detected
- Scope expansion beyond frozen intent
- 3+ consecutive task failures
- Sub-agent attempts to spawn further sub-agents (no recursion)
Risk Classification
| Class | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
| A | Irreversible, destructive, or unbounded | HALT immediately |
| B | Bounded, resolvable with clarification | Pause, ask user |
| C | Cosmetic, non-operative | Proceed with note |
Forbidden Actions
- Creating new autonomous orchestrators
- Modifying this skill file
- Accessing credentials without explicit need
- External API calls not in original scope
- Recursive spawning (sub-agents spawning sub-agents)
Stop Commands
User can stop at any time with:
- "stop"
- "halt"
- "cancel orchestration"
- "abort"
On stop: immediately terminate all spawned sessions, output summary of completed work, await new instructions.
Memory Integration
During Orchestration
- Append to
memory/orchestrator-wisdom.mdfor learnings - Reference existing memory files for context
After Orchestration
- Update daily memory with orchestration summary
- Persist significant learnings to MEMORY.md if valuable
Example Usage
Simple (magic word):
ulw refactor the authentication module to use JWT
Explicit activation:
activate autonomous-skill-orchestrator
Build a REST API with user registration, login, and profile endpoints
With constraints:
use autonomous-skill-orchestrator
- Build payment integration with Stripe
- MUST: Use existing database patterns
- MUST NOT: Store card numbers locally
- Deadline: Complete core flow only